Click Cover to Read Digital Edition



ICBA National Convention
March 1-5
Gaylord Palms Resort
ABA Mutual Community Bank Conference
March 22 & 23
Marriott Marquis
Washington, D.C.
Card Forum & Expo
April 8-10
More events >  

<- Back

Share |

Print Friendly and PDF

ABA Calls For Withdrawal of Capital Proposals


Nov 29 - The American Bankers Association detailed the negative impact proposed Basel III capital rules would have on banks and the broader economy in testimony before the House Financial Services Subcommittees on Financial Institutions & Consumer Credit, and on Insurance, Housing and Community Opportunity.

During a hearing titled, “Examining the Impact of the Proposed Rules to Implement Basel III Capital Standards,” Fifth Third Bancorp Chief Financial Officer Daniel T. Poston testified that the banking regulators’ standardized approach “should be withdrawn and an empirical study should be undertaken to better inform the development of an appropriate set of rules.”

“Rules with the power to create significant economic dislocations must be carefully considered and based on strong analytical research,” Poston said. “That was not the case in this rulemaking. In the desire to make changes, it should not be forgotten that the more complex the rules and the larger the change, the more likely they are to create unforeseen and detrimental consequences to our economy.”

Poston noted the industry’s strong support of standards for appropriate levels of high quality bank capital, but expressed concerns about the complexity and arbitrary nature of the Basel III proposal.   

“The issue here is not about higher levels of capital, as it is widely recognized that more capital would have made the financial problems for banks less severe in the last crisis,” Poston said.  “Rather, it is the complex operation of the Basel III proposals, the volatility of capital measures and the arbitrary – and excessive – risk weights that will hurt banks, our customers and the U.S. economy overall.”

Poston also warned that the proposals would have a highly negative impact on mortgage markets.

“The proposals related to mortgages would lead to a significant contraction in the mortgage market, completely upset home equity lending and further tighten and raise the cost of mortgage and home equity credit for borrowers,” Poston said. “Some proposals specifically target many safe and sound mortgage products and services for harsh capital treatment, driving up costs and compelling banks to reduce – or even stop – their involvement in mortgage lending.”

For a copy of Poston’s full testimony, please click here.