Subscribe Today to the 'New'
BANK BOARD LETTER
20% Discount on One-Year Subscription
Beginning in January 2014, The Bank Board Letter, one of the nation's premier newsletters for directors of financial institutions and their holding companies, will be available in print and digital editions.
To introduce you to the redesigned and expanded Bank Board Letter, we are offering a 20% discount off the regular one-year subscription price of $74. (Current subscribers may take advantage of this special offer by extending their subscriptions.)
CLICK HERE to take advantage of this special offer.
Contact Kristi Wagner at 913-261-7053 about bulk subscriptions.
Click on the issue above to look at a sample issue.
All Federal Reserve Bank Presidents Support Money Market Mutual Fund Reform in Joint Letter to the FSOC
Feb 13 - The presidents of the 12 Federal Reserve Banks have submitted a joint letter responding to the Financial Stability Oversight Council's proposal on money market mutual fund reform.
The 12 Reserve Bank presidents support the council's efforts to address the structural vulnerabilities of MMFs. They also agree with the council's determination that MMFs' activities and practices could create or increase the risk of liquidity and credit problems spreading through the financial system.
“Money market mutual funds have no explicit capacity to absorb losses in the event of a decrease in the value of assets held within the fund’s portfolio,” said the Reserve Bank presidents in their joint letter. “This structure gives rise to a risk of destabilizing money market mutual fund runs by creating a first mover advantage.”
In the letter the Reserve Bank presidents:
- Discuss the risks associated with MMF activities and practices.
- Focus on issues that should be addressed as part of any reform proposal, such as enhancing the accuracy of market-based net asset values.
- Present observations on each of the three reform alternatives in the council’s proposal.
- Discuss why standby liquidity fees and temporary redemption gates would not address financial stability risks.
- Concur with the council that more than one alternative could address the financial stability concerns posed by MMFs – for example, fund sponsors could be permitted to offer both a floating NAV fund and separately a stable NAV fund with a capital buffer (or a buffer coupled with a Minimum Balance at Risk).
Click here to read the letter.