Throughout the years, I have had the privilege of working with many clients who were either a lead bank or a participant in a participated loan. Invariably, the work involved a troubled loan. Unfortunately, in many cases, there was friction between the lead bank and its participants over any number of issues. Too often, the lead bank and participants were not fully aware of the various terms and provisions of their loan participation agreements, which can vary widely from loan to loan.
When and Why to Participate
There are several good reasons to participate a loan. The most common is that the lead bank or participant is presented with a lending opportunity that exceeds its legal lending limits. Finding a good participant partner makes sense. Another good reason, but perhaps more rare, is when a bank is presented with a lending opportunity that is outside of its scope of expertise or knowledge of the borrower’s industry. In that case, a bank may bring in a lead lender with the capability to manage the credit and monitor the borrower’s performance. Yet another good reason may be a common relationship between a group of lenders and a specific borrower, all of whom have had experience working together on various loans.
At the same time, there are a few bad reasons to participate a loan, often leading to trouble. For instance, a drive for loan growth is often a reason why banks become participants. If the underwriting process is insufficient to filter risks, or if the participating bank does not have a good understanding of the borrower, collateral or business, the participant may be shackled to a costly troubled loan without the means to control its own destiny. This is especially true with out-of-market loans involving borrowers and collateral in other cities and states. The distance, alone, can impede the participant’s ability to monitor and control its risks. A desire to share risks on a credit is another reason banks may participate a loan. In some cases, the desire may be motivated by risk factors that would ordinarily prompt a decision to deny credit. In other words, the desire to share risk is actually a desire to share a bad loan.
Rights and Duties of the Lead Bank
Regardless of when and why a bank participates in a loan, the lead bank and its participants must understand all of the terms and provisions they wish to include in the participation agreement and carefully document them. Although there are various forms of participation agreements available through software vendors, most are drafted by lead banks and their attorneys. Therefore, they vary widely from form to form.
The rights and duties of the lead bank typically fall into several categories — contractual, fiduciary, accounting and management. Contractual duties are ordinarily those that are specified in the participation agreement itself. But courts have also held that the terms of a participation agreement may also include terms from the participation commitment letter, participation certificate or other documents associated with the loan.
For instance, in the 1995 case of North American Savings Bank v. RTC, the Resolution Trust Corp. was appointed conservator of a failed bank that participated in a loan held by North American Savings Bank, and sued to enforce a letter agreement guarantying the first $3 million in losses of the participant. The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the loan participation agreement, letter agreement and loan participation certificate were all intended by the parties to be part of one single agreement, and were not barred by the parole evidence rule.
A well-drafted participation agreement should address the rights and limitations of the lead bank to take the following actions, either with or without participant approval:
All parties should carefully review their respective rights and limitations. A participation agreement should also define the specific duties (as opposed to rights) of the lead bank. These duties will generally include:
It is this latter duty that causes the most confusion among the parties. Participants often think that a lead bank has a duty to repurchase their participation interest at the first sign of trouble. Obligations to repurchase rarely exist in participation agreements, although many agreements give the lead bank a right of repurchase. Courts have held that an obligation to repurchase must clearly appear in the participation agreement to be enforceable.
Rights and Duties of the Participants
Conversely, a participation agreement should define the participants’ rights and duties as well. Typical rights of a participant will include:
Similarly, typical duties of a participant will include:
In addition to the rights and duties of the lead bank and participants, there are a number of other terms that require special attention. Parties often overlook these terms in their review of participation agreements. These include:
Michael A. Campbell is chair of the creditors’ rights, loan enforcement and creditor bankruptcy representation practice group with Polsinelli Shughart PC in St. Louis. Contact the author at 314-552-6805 or mcampbell(at)polsinelli.com.
Copyright (c) October 2012 by BankNews Media