Dec 12 - The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has announced actions to halt two alleged mortgage loan modification scams it believes ripped-off thousands of struggling homeowners across the country. In total, these operations took in more than $10 million by charging consumers for services that falsely promised to prevent foreclosures or renegotiate troubled mortgages.
“We are taking on schemes that prey on consumers who are struggling to pay their mortgages or facing foreclosure,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. "We are especially concerned with those who misrepresent government programs or websites to divert distressed homeowners from needed assistance."
At the request of the CFPB, U.S. District Court Judges in the State of California have ordered a halt to both operations, the Gordon Law Firm and the National Legal Help Center, and frozen their assets while the CFPB moves forward with the cases. The case involving the National Legal Help Center was initially referred to the CFPB by the Office of the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program and Treasury’s Office of Financial Stability, which have coordinated closely with the bureau throughout the investigation.
“It is absolutely unacceptable for unscrupulous con artists to take advantage of our nation’s housing crisis by targeting homeowners looking for help from TARP’s Home Affordable Modification Program,” said Christy Romero, special inspector general for TARP. “We thank the CFPB for protecting homeowners. SIGTARP will continue to stop these scams and educate homeowners that mortgage modifications through HAMP are free.”
The CFPB is targeting loan modification operations that attempt to disguise their false promises of relief for struggling homeowners with claims that they are performing legal work or are a law firm. The bureau is also particularly concerned with schemes that attract victims with false claims that they are endorsed by or represent the government. These tactics are used by mortgage relief scams to attract victims, add credibility to their schemes, or exploit certain legal exemptions for the practice of law.
The CFPB complaints allege that the defendants in both cases violated the Dodd-Frank Act and Regulation O, formerly known as the Mortgage Assistance Relief Services Rule. These laws prohibit unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices and protect distressed homeowners from mortgage relief scams.
Violations of the law alleged in the CFPB’s complaints in both cases include:
·Illegally charged large upfront fees: It is against the law for mortgage relief providers to charge fees before services are provided. However, the defendants in both cases collected fees early on, typically ranging between $1,000 and $4,500 from each distressed homeowner, for services that rarely if ever materialized.
·Deceptively claimed to be affiliated with government agencies or programs: Defendants in both cases used deceptive language and mailings with government logos, letterhead, or marks to mislead consumers into believing that their mortgage relief services were sponsored by or associated with government agencies or programs.
·Misrepresented that they would secure loan modifications for consumers: Defendants misled consumers that the defendants were experienced negotiators who would substantially reduce mortgage payments, and that defendants would identify legal violations by consumers’ banks or mortgage companies to use as leverage in loan modification negotiations. However, it appears that defendants failed to provide meaningful relief for consumers.
·Instructed consumers to stop paying their mortgages and stop contacting their lenders: Financially distressed consumers were told to avoid interactions with their lenders and to stop mortgage payments because the defendants would provide relief, potentially putting the consumers unknowingly at risk of losing their homes and/or ruining their credit scores.
The CFPB also alleges that, after pocketing thousands of dollars in illegal fees from one distressed homeowner after another, the defendants in both cases typically stopped returning consumers’ phone calls and emails. In the end, many consumers learned that the defendants had not contacted their lenders or obtained any meaningful relief for them. Ultimately, homeowners across the country lost thousands of dollars each and suffered significant economic injury, including losing their homes.
National Legal Help Center
The more recent of the two actions involves California residents Najia Jalan and Richard K. Nelson and their operation, National Legal Help Center, which appears to target consumers in all 50 states with false promises of mortgage relief. According to the CFPB, National Legal Help Center falsely claimed that they would provide legal representation for consumers even though the individual defendants are not attorneys and consumers received no actual legal representation.
Defendants falsely claimed that, for a fee, they could assist consumers in getting benefits from government-affiliated programs, including the recent nationwide mortgage servicing settlement between state attorneys general and the federal government, and the five largest mortgage servicers. Defendants also falsely claimed that they were associated with the Independent Foreclosure Review program overseen by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Reserve. In reality, the defendants were not affiliated with either of the programs or in a position to provide the promised benefits to consumers. In fact, on March 16, 2012, the OCC issued an alert on its website about this scam.
The CFPB lodged its complaint against National Legal Help Center and requested a temporary restraining order in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on Dec. 3, 2012. The court granted the request the next day.
The full text of the National Legal Help Center complaint is available here: http://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/201212_cfpb_nlhc-complaint.pdf
The full text of the Temporary Restraining Order entered by the court against National Legal Help Center is available here: http://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/201212_cfpb_nlhc-tro.pdf
The bureau’s memorandum in support of its application for the TRO against National Legal Help Center is available here: http://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/201212_cfpb_nlhc-tro-memo.pdf
Gordon Law Firm
In July 2012, the CFPB also took similar action against California residents Chance Edward Gordon and Abraham Michael Pessar and their companies. The CFPB alleges they are responsible for operating a network of mortgage loan modification businesses that targeted consumers in over 25 states. The defendants allegedly gained homeowners’ trust by using Gordon’s “law firm” status and led consumers to believe that a law firm was working with their banks and mortgage companies to modify mortgage loans or provide foreclosure relief, while the defendants typically failed to deliver relief.
The CFPB lodged its complaint against the Gordon Law Firm and requested a temporary restraining order in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on July 17, 2012. The court granted the request on the next day. On November 16, 2012, the Court entered a preliminary injunction order halting the defendants’ alleged unlawful conduct and freezing their assets while the case proceeds.